The Legal Discrimination readings look at a number of examples where arguably good people are faced with challenging ethical situations and take perhaps a less than ethical stance in reaction thereto. For this activity, you are to assume the role of a psychologist, Rachel, and select 3 of the examples and discuss whether if Rachel would agree or disagree with the outcome or conclusion. In the discussion, Rachel must make the most compelling arguments to convince and persuade the course instructor that her point of view is the correct one.1. responses must between 400 words and 600 words2.Responses must be in the third person, only.3.Each response must be supported and properly cited using at least three resources from the course material. Direct quotes are not acceptable.